|
Wow, I haven't written an article in a LONG time, but I'm still an avid reader! When I read City Hall's article on a Whyville Senate, I became intrigued,
and as
I read it, I realized that although I knew the fundamentals of a senate, I didn't
really know anything formal about it. After some research, I feel I have a
better idea, which I'd like to share with you, starting from the beginning...
A candidate is defined as "A person who seeks or is nominated for an office,
prize, or honor." (according to http://www.dictionary.com) And in our case,
this would be basically whomever wished to become the first Whyville Senator.
Senators hold great responsibility, so not just anyone can become one in most countries. "According to Article I, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, a senator must be 30 years of age, a citizen of the United States for 9 years, and must reside in the state he or she
represents at the time of election." (this from http://www.senate.gov) Even in the ancient
Roman Republic, there were restrictions on who could be in the senate: only
members of the wealthy, elite patrician class, people who had previously been involved
in the Roman government could join the senate.
Of course, I don't think Whyville's Senator Candidates need to have that many
restrictions. Perhaps there should be something similar to the rules of becoming a Y-Helper? Such as, being
a citizen for 3 months. This would help make sure citizens were accustomed with
Whyville, and would allow them to judge what Whyville and its people need, so
they could better prepare their platform!
A platform is "A formal declaration of the principles on which a group, such as
a political party, makes its appeal to the public." (also from http://www.dictionary.com) In other words, a platform is the basic ideas and values that a candidate
declares, in order
to gain public support and popularity. It also contains the different reforms
the candidate says (s)he will make during their term.
Generally, a person can *say* they will do all sorts of magical things, but does
anyone really know if the person will uphold those promises? No. Perhaps that's why
members in the Roman Senate had to participate in other Government positions
before they could join the senate. But since there is such a limited number of
Y-Helpers, Whyville Safety Patrol members, etc. I think that limitation would be unfair
here. Instead there should be (like
the Editor mentioned) disclosure of past punishments, etc. On the other hand, that would
create a negative stigma. So I think that positive contributions should also be
mentioned!
Oh, and I think the whole term idea should be subjective, based on the Citizens'
approval of the Senator. If they enjoy him/her then (s)he should be able to
stay! If not, then (s)he should be replaced!
Anyway, that's all I have to say, and I wish all participants the best of luck in
their candidacy!
-QUISP
Editor's Note: As with all political correspondence, no candidate is specially favored by Whyville or the Times. This and all other articles published by the Times are opinion pieces, published based on the article's merits, and without regard to the writer's political aspirations. If you feel candidate-written articles should not be published, please send your best arguments in article form to the Times. Thank you.
|