|
With much aspiration, stampedes of politically informed activists
have rushed over to City Hall to vote for Whyville's first Senator. A position
not to be taken lightly, its rewards range from the power of decision making,
having personal face parts made by our vary own fashion guru, and, of course,
the much-revered bragging
rights.
So far, many participants in this race for
political superiority -- boys and girls, young and old -- have published
themselves as worthy candidates. Political platforms have been made, articles
have been written, and campaigns were established early, decorating the festive atmosphere...
When I saw the first announcement about plans for a Senator, I was excited that such an event could occur. However, as I read up on the platforms and
scanned the petitions, I was surprised with the approach that many candidates
chose to take. I know of one individual who is running, and I will say -- without,
I think, being debated -- that she has become obsessed with the election. It's true
that the stamina to win and do an admirable job could be signs of a good
candidate. Nevertheless, an election on a website is nothing to be obsessed
about, especially since your life involves so many other aspects outside of Whyville.
Many people have forgotten the true meaning of a political leader. Innumerable promises
have been made, and I am sure the majority cannot be met. I have read
about plans for clam showers, new chatrooms, bigger shopping venues, many new
ideas that *will* require money. We know that Whyville does not have vast
amounts of cash to spend. Instead of making
promises involving physical changes that you know will get you votes, yet you
have no way to actually make real, I believe a
commendable candidate will pick another approach. I have not seen this yet.
How can a Senator have full control over the well-being of Whyville when City
Hall has not figured out everything for herself? Surely, we do not want our
Senator to be a Safety Patrol Worker's worst nightmare -- constantly being muted
or fined out of punishment. You would want a candidate to be influential in the
Whyville community. How do we know that the person who has been elected is not a
bad-mouthing, potty-talk, safety endangering individual?
I have yet to see applicants for Senator go out into the public and broadcast
themselves, or talk about their potential plans for the future. Posting your
platform on a petition and longing for signatures is one thing, but actually
taking the initiative to get involved and show your rabidity and positions is
another -- I know one individual has already planned campaign parties, mailed
random citizens about plans, spoke up in chatrooms, and made campaign signs and
buttons. Your activism may just get you the 125-or-so votes that are
required for your platform to reach the next level of our election.
Journalists must always be honest, and since I am still in practice,
I must
admit that the campaigns have not electrified me. I do not agree with the way
that they were set up, and I know that Whyville differs from the real world, but
the procedures were unlike the Senate elections in real life.
Therefore, I will not be voting for the first Senator -- unless a candidate
leaves me in awe with such hair raising and eye-popping ideas. It may be true
that as a citizen it is my right to vote, but it is also my right *not* to vote
if I see fit.
A senate platform or platform shoes, you say? Right now, I choose the shoes,
since they do say "these boots were made for walking...."
Burning Up,
TIKE
|