www.whyville.net Oct 10, 2004 Weekly Issue



Ledyba
Guest Writer

Nader's Off the Ohio Ballot

Users' Rating
Rate this article
 
FRONT PAGE
CREATIVE WRITING
SCIENCE
HOT TOPICS
POLITICS
HEALTH
PANDEMIC

A loss of freedom for Ohio! That's how some are describing taking Ralph Nader off the Ohio ballot.

For third-party candidate Ralph Nader to be allowed on the state's ballot, he needed 13,000 Ohioan signatures. However, he came up 1,300 short. It was a huge blow for those of us who are undecided between Kerry and Bush, and for those of us who, er, wanted to vote Nader just to spike the political system. :^D Heh heh.

Anyway, on closer examination, it also came to light that some of the signatures had been FORGED, and some addresses were FAKE! Those are jailable offenses, and it is hard to believe that Nader's representatives would resort to doing that, even IF it meant keeping them on the ballot.

It may be a twist of fate that made this happen, but it may have been for the better. Significant third party candidates (like Nader in 2000 or Ross Perot in 1992) usually takes away about three percent of the vote, or more. Therefore, as Ohio is also a "swing" state, which means it's important, could decide the election, it is imPERative that the Democrats and Republicans get as many votes as they can.

However, it is disappointing for those of us who don't really want to vote Bush or Kerry, and there are many who may not vote at all because of this.

And now, I leave you with a joke.

Why did the chicken cross the road?
Colonel Sanders's answer: I missed one?


Editor's Note: Thanks for the report, Ledyba! We'd very much appreciate knowing where you got your news, though, so we know who's accusing the Nader campaign of producing forged signatures. Thanks!!

 

Did you like this article?
1 Star = Bleh.5 Stars = Props!
Rate it!
Ymail this article to a friend.
Discuss this article in the Forums.

  Back to front page


times@whyville.net
4564